A recently signed peace agreement between the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Rwanda in Washington has sparked a mix of reactions. Former DRC president Joseph Kabila dismissed it as merely a “trade agreement.” The deal, agreed upon last Friday, emphasizes the “disengagement, disarmament, and conditional integration” of armed groups in eastern DRC, but lacks comprehensive details.
While critics like Kabila voice concerns, others view the agreement as a potential shift towards resolving a longstanding conflict. Tensions surged earlier this year when M23 rebels captured significant territory, including key cities and airports in eastern DRC. The UN estimates that thousands have died, with hundreds of thousands forced from their homes, although the rebel group contends the actual death toll is under 1,000.
Kabila’s commentary on the accord’s signatories hinted at dissatisfaction over the absence of M23 representatives, raising questions about the legitimacy of the peace process. Local residents echoed his sentiments, asserting that meaningful peace cannot be achieved without the involvement of all stakeholders, including armed groups.
Sam Zarifi from Physicians for Human Rights warned that the agreement lacks provisions addressing human rights and fails to include sustainable justice for victims of the conflict. Conversely, some like humanitarian leader Stephanie Marungu view the signing as a hopeful step towards stability, although she acknowledges potential challenges in implementation.
The future implications of this deal are uncertain, with concerns that it may primarily benefit a select few, especially amidst ongoing economic hardships faced by the local populace.
Source: www.bbc.com
