Commentary Questions the Benefits of a PPP-PNC Union for Guyana's Governance
A letter published in Kaieteur News suggests that the elite politicians in Guyana require accountability to the electorate and questions whether a combined PPP-PNC risks removing necessary political rivalry for improved governance.
In a letter to the Editor published by Kaieteur News on November 09, 2026, Faiyaz Alli, who is associated with AFC and APNU, stated that the democratic process in Guyana, which began in October 1992, did not result in democracy for all Guyanese. Alli noted that voters observed the nation being managed primarily for a select group of elected individuals. The letter further observed that the transition of government to the APNU and AFC coalition resulted in a similar misuse of privilege by the new leaders in positions of power.
Alli asserted that Guyana's established political elite do not require an easier route to power and emphasized that politicians must consistently remain accountable to the electorate. The writer also contended that the use of loyalty induced by fear of opposing groups should cease being a tactic in political campaigns. Alli suggested that a union between the PPP and PNC might eliminate the need for political competition, which could aid in enhancing governance. Instead of focusing on methods to maintain power, the letter proposed concentrating on developing appropriate constitutional, electoral, and governance reforms, along with establishing institutions that are suitable for a truly inclusive democratic Guyana. Alli posed the question of whether this approach would not constitute a more authentic method of serving the nation.